06 · Topic cluster
Monitoring systems and government M&E
M&E information systems, DHIS2, results-based management, national M&E systems, and performance contracting in Kenya.
At some point a monitoring function stops being a set of spreadsheets and becomes a system — with data flows, interoperability questions, an aggregation hierarchy, and someone accountable for it running. This section covers that transition and the public-sector machinery built on top of it.
Government M&E deserves its own treatment because its incentives differ. A national system is not primarily trying to learn whether an intervention worked; it is trying to hold institutions to commitments, allocate budget and report to a legislature. Designs that make sense for a donor-funded project can fail completely inside that logic, and the reverse is equally true.
- 01 · Updated 18 August 2026
M&E information systems: data flow, interoperability and architecture
Designing the data flow behind an M&E system: sources to decisions, routine vs survey data, interoperability standards, and build-vs-adopt choices.
- 02 · Updated 18 August 2026
DHIS2 in monitoring and evaluation
What DHIS2 is, where it fits in national health information systems and programme M&E, its data model in brief, and how to work with it, not around it.
- 03 · Updated 18 August 2026
Results-based management (RBM)
RBM as a management discipline: the results chain, the managing-for-outcomes lifecycle, UN and World Bank practice, and why RBM reforms fail.
- 04 · Updated 18 August 2026
National M&E systems
How countries institutionalise M&E: whole-of-government systems, Kenya's NIMES and the 2022 National M&E Policy, diagnostic lenses, and African lessons.
- 05 · Updated 18 August 2026
Performance contracting in Kenya's public service
Kenya's performance contracting regime: the annual PC cycle, cascading targets, evaluation and ranking, the legal frame, and what the evidence supports.