09 · Topic cluster
Norms, standards and quality
UNEG Norms and Standards, the JCSEE Program Evaluation Standards, the African Evaluation Principles, and how evaluation quality is assessed.
Evaluation has a professional infrastructure — norms, standards, principles and quality frameworks issued by the bodies that commission and practise it. Knowing them matters in two situations: when you are commissioning and need to say what good looks like, and when your own work is being assessed against a framework you did not choose.
These instruments are not interchangeable. The UNEG norms govern the UN system. The JCSEE standards emerged from North American programme evaluation and are organised around utility, feasibility, propriety, accuracy and accountability. The African Evaluation Principles, adopted in 2021, respond in part to the charge that imported frameworks encode assumptions that do not travel. The overlaps are real, and so are the differences.
- 00 · Updated 18 August 2026
The UNEG Norms and Standards for Evaluation
What the UNEG Norms and Standards require: independence, impartiality, credibility, utility — and how non-UN organisations can use them.
- 01 · Updated 18 August 2026
The Program Evaluation Standards and the AEA Guiding Principles
North America's two anchors: the JCSEE Program Evaluation Standards' five attribute groups and the AEA Guiding Principles for Evaluators.
- 02 · Updated 18 August 2026
The African Evaluation Principles and Made in Africa Evaluation
AfrEA's African Evaluation Principles (2021) and the Made in Africa Evaluation agenda: origins, content, debates, and what they change in practice.
- 03 · Updated 18 August 2026
Evaluation Quality Assessment and Meta-Evaluation
How to judge an evaluation: DAC quality standards, UNEG checklists, meta-evaluation practice, and building a proportionate internal QA system.